Progressive evangelical preacher, Jim Wallis, writes about the moral dimensions of economic policy. In defending the Employee Free Choice Act, Wallis invokes memories of his father --a negotiator for Detroit Edison-- and argues that the EFCA levels the playing field between employer and employee:
The chasm is huge.
Enter Portland's own "million dollar baby", retiring PGE CEO, Peggy Fowler. Even she seems embarrassed by --and defensive of-- the generous terms of her golden parachute. "It pales," she said, in comparison to the bounty bestowed on her predecessor. Besides that, she argues, "analysts" demand competitive pay for the CEO's of "performing" companies."
Maybe so. But who has PGE been "performing" for? Not it's stockholders, who have seen the value of their stock drop 40% since the company went public. Not ratepayers, either. According to Bob Jenks of the Citizen's Utility Board,
In reality, says Jenks, we --the ratepayers-- have been "paying Peggy to build up her retirement."
Let's say the average hourly wage for PGE workers is $40, meaning an annual income of $83K. (It isn't, of course, even for the unionized segment of the workforce. This website for PGE customer technical services pegs it hourly pay at $16.72 ...with no benefits.) But anyway, say you did make that $83K a year, probably as a skilled electrician/lineman with years of experience.
That's still only about a tenth of what Peggy Fowler is going to make in retirement.
A few years ago PGE became independent of ENRON by selling shares to the public at $30 per. Today those shares are selling around $16.50. Worse yet the PGE board is financing its Biglow Canyon Wind Energy project by selling 11 million shares of stock at a price of $14.10.
Peggy's package surely is not based on what she has done for the shareholders.
Posted by: howard | March 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM