Is poverty an excuse for lower achievement in school?
The "no excuses" crowd --No Child Left Behind enthusiasts, DC's Michelle Rhee, and, yes, Barack Obama and his Secretary of Education Arne Duncan-- say no. As far as schools are concerned, there are absolutely no excuses for poor student performance, including poverty.
Others argue (me included) that schools themselves are not responsible for the lousy test scores of kids in poverty. In fact, if you are inclined to take test scores seriously, the "gap" between the scores of poor minority students and wealthier white students has significantly decreased over the past couple of decades.
The bigger issue is whether schools alone should be held responsible for closing the income gap in America, as Obama has implied in his pronouncements on education reform. I've argued that poverty is a social issue, not just a school issue. Fixing the schools alone will not cure poverty. It's unlikely that fixing schools will close the "achievement gap."
Now comes further evidence from Cornell University bolstering the argument that poverty is indeed an "excuse" for poor academic achievement. The authors of the Cornell study, published in the Proceediings of the National Academy of Sciences,
"...show that childhood poverty is inversely related to working memory in young adults. Furthermore, this prospective relationship is mediated by elevated chronic stress during childhood."
That means poverty related stress affects memory, a key tool for learning anything. Furthermore, the effect on memory is related to a physiological "response to chronic environmental demands."
That's hard biological science, not "psychobabble."
What does this mean for school reform?
It means that the "no excuses" argument is fundamentally wrong. It means that the NCLB demand that all kids, regardless of circumstance, should be able to "perform" as well academically as everyone else, is wrong. It means that test-based school accountability is wrong. It means that teacher merit pay (based on test scores) is wrong. It means that the anti-teachers union so-called "reformers" are wrong.
Laughably wrong.
It doesn't mean that schools should abjure calls for reform. It does mean that reform should not be defined and packaged and handed down by politicians, neoliberals, charter school proponents, billionaire businessmen, Teach for America novices, or anyone who believes that learning can be measured by standardized test scores.
Who should define and spearhead public school reform? Simple. Building educators, meaning teachers and anyone else who works in or near a classroom, the people truly concerned with the education of the children they encounter everyday.
Teachers know about poverty. Broad and Gates and the Business Roundtable don't. It's clear who we should listen to.
More on the impact of poverty on the developing brain:
Poor Children's Brain Activity Resembles That of Stroke Victims, EEG Shows
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081203092429.htm
One of the strengths of the above study (accepted for publication in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience) is that the children studied had "no neural damage, no prenatal exposure to drugs and alcohol, no neurological damage," Kishiyama said. "Yet, the prefrontal cortex is not functioning as efficiently as it should be. This difference may manifest itself in problem solving and school performance."
Poverty and Potential: Out-of-School Factors and School Success
http://www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Berliner_NonSchool.pdf
Posted by: Tauna Rogers | April 18, 2009 at 04:19 PM
The majority of Oregon public school districts are not in need of reform. Those districts and their management, budgeting and staffing practices should serve as examples for Oregon's poor performing and districts that inequitably allocate human and financial resources in their buildings.
Poverty, brain and other studies have shown for years that there is a need for investments of government resources so that all public K-12 students can be close to equal at the starting line. Bell Curve studies have proven that it is impossible for all public K-12 students to be close to equal at the finish line.
True reform will require a lot more than current or former classroom teachers, many of whom who have been protective toward the status quo in districts most in need of reform while their lobbyists have used political clout to maximize K-12 funding at the expense of preschool programs that would reduce the number of poor childrem arriving at kindergarten ill-prepared to function in a disciplined learning environment.
Posted by: howard | April 19, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Thanks Tauna. You are one of the building educators who should be leading school reform efforts. Well, you are, actually, and for that I thank you again.
Unfortunately, I see in today's news that Obama plans to link teachers to the test performance of students in order to figure out who are the good ones and the bad ones. Not a promising sign.
And Howard, you're wrong about teachers. As long as teachers are on the defensive, they'll react reflexively to protect what meager resource scraps they're allotted. But once empowered by enlightened administrators and given a place at the decision making table, wonderful things can happen. I speak from experience as a classroom teacher who was fortunate enough to work with a series of enlightened principals and district level staff.
All schools need reform in the way they structure learning. What works for middle class schools will also work for poor schools. And teachers are the key players.
Posted by: Terry | April 19, 2009 at 01:06 PM
Lincoln, er, Obama, does not believe in the excesses of "no child". He's not stupid, and only idiots believe in test-based education.
Having worked as a "psychometrist", I learned very long ago that tests of "intelligence" as well as of educational performance are bogus, serving to maintain a class-based system rather than to meaningfully measure anything of value.
Only a moment's reflection should convince the doubters that poverty is the primary difference between, e.g., racial groups, on most tests of educational performance. It's not rocket science.
Posted by: Harry Kershner | April 19, 2009 at 01:33 PM
Summer is the great season for all sports in the open air. People can go swimming and sightseeing. It is time for all things to grow up.
Posted by: coach wallets | July 01, 2010 at 11:47 PM
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such great information being shared freely out there.
Posted by: Impotence causes | October 06, 2010 at 01:19 PM
I am so into your article that I can not help to check out whether there is a newly update on you page. Your pages are so funny!
Posted by: cheap ugg boots | October 29, 2010 at 08:52 PM
This is the first time I view your blog. I find that the time I spend on your blog page are worthwhile. The information from your article are really different from others. WISH YOU BE FASHION IN YOUR LIVE.
Posted by: air jordan 1 | October 31, 2010 at 10:56 PM
Excellent post and wonderful blog, I really like this type of interesting articles
Posted by: send gifts to Pakistan | March 18, 2011 at 11:32 PM
And buy a pair with heels when you get there. Nice italian ones are cheap there, and people will expect it. The blunnies will be great for walking.
Posted by: sinful bikini | June 21, 2011 at 01:11 AM
thanks so much for the kind words about TalentedApps. We are blessed to be part of such a wonderful community of bloggers.
Posted by: Running Barefoot | June 22, 2011 at 01:35 AM
If love is the answer, could you please rephrase the question?
Posted by: Costumes | August 24, 2011 at 08:04 PM
Thumbs up to your creativity, your way of writing, your narration, your intelligence and lastly your decision to write on this topic! Hats off man…keep it up
Posted by: UGG Australia Sale UK | September 22, 2011 at 01:03 AM
i come here first time. Thank you for sharing your admin would get ready a severely beneficial write-up I congratulate.s I very agree with your views from here.
Posted by: jordan jams | September 26, 2011 at 11:13 PM
Ahead of moving actually to evaluation of Phen375 you have to realize that it is really what you are searching for. Phen375 expanding authority for being risk free, synthetic and safe for long term obesity treatment has prompted it to become a best item today.
Posted by: Phen375 | October 03, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Oh my gosh! That is the charming item I've ever seen !!!! Very often to receive your dotoral level you have to order essay writing service
Posted by: cheap ugg boots | October 14, 2011 at 07:08 PM
If you need more traffic to your website check out the website in my name. It really helped me and i think it can help your website.
Posted by: best online pharmacy | October 17, 2011 at 02:32 PM
Very interesting thanks. I believe there's even more that could be on there! keep it up
Posted by: the best seo company | October 17, 2011 at 03:05 PM
This kind of topic is good for people to learn more about it, and that people should be every day less ignorant, and medicine for this is the reading of issues like this.Thanks for you sharing..
Posted by: Moncler Outlet | October 19, 2011 at 01:39 AM
Nice sms significantly. That's the reason why I have tried them around my do the job, in case it is ok for everyone. My organization is exciting for the reason that field, and desire an individual enable. Satisfy, mention Indeed. Thank You So Much
Posted by: Ugg Boots outlet | November 04, 2011 at 11:21 PM
Ultimo Fashions is an online store where you can buy Michael Jackson Jackets. That is available in all size and at affordable rates.
Posted by: Moncler Outlet | December 29, 2011 at 07:42 PM