Charles Krauthammer has it right:
"As in his rhetorically brilliant national-security speech yesterday claiming to have undone Bush's moral travesties, the military commissions flip-flop is accompanied by the usual Obama three-step: (a) excoriate the Bush policy, (b) ostentatiously unveil cosmetic changes, (c) adopt the Bush policy."
The right-wing Krauthammer undoubtedly approves.
Those on the left, however, were "stunned" by Obama's embrace of military commissions --or tribunals-- and even more shocked at his announcement that he would develop a "legal framework" to justify preventive --or prolonged-- detention.
Constitutionally speaking, how is that any different than the Bush administration soliciting legal opinions to justify torture, which Obama seems disinclined to investigate, let alone prosecute, even though torture is clearly a crime both domestically and internationally?
Here's the Center for Constitutional Rights' Michael Ratner:
And the Center's Shayana Kadidal:
Speaking of torture, The Progressive's Matthew Rothschild writes
That's true on a number of levels. But you only hear it from the left. Or from those well-versed in law, especially Constitutional law. And therein lies the ultimate irony.
Barack Obama taught Constitutional law. He knows what passes Constitutional muster and what doesn't. Yet the "new" tools he says we need to combat the threat of terrorism all apparently involve the undermining of Constitutional rights.
In short, as the anti-left Wall Street Journal concluded last February, Obama is "...erring on the side of keeping the country safe rather than appeasing the political left."
"Appeasing the left" is right-wing speak for taking steps to protect Constitutional guarantees of fundamental civil liberties.
Re: "Constitutionally speaking, how is that any different than the Bush administration soliciting legal opinions to justify torture, which Obama seems disinclined to investigate, let alone prosecute, even though torture is clearly a crime both domestically and internationally?"
Of course it's no different, and He is no different. (As Matt Taibbi sagely predicted before the election, he has become "the same old deal dressed up in black skin and a natty suit".)
Obama knows quite well that he is already guilty of the crimes that leftish Democrats seem fixated on vis-a-vis Bush/Cheney. Isn't it time to stop complaining about the last administration and instead to start calling for impeachment of the present torturer-in-chief?
"Small wonder that the President advises us to look forward, not backward -- a convenient doctrine for those who hold the clubs. Those who are beaten by them tend to see the world differently, much to our annoyance...Historical amnesia is a dangerous phenomenon, not only because it undermines moral and intellectual integrity, but also because it lays the
groundwork for crimes that lie ahead." (The Torture Memos)
Posted by: Harry Kershner | May 23, 2009 at 06:04 PM
I have recently started using the blogengine.net and I having some problems here? in your blog you stated that we need to enable write permissions on the App_Data folder...unfortunately I don't understand how to enable it.
Posted by: replica handbsgs | October 14, 2010 at 08:35 PM
However, with the Monster Beats, the adviser will access the aggregate just to block alfresco noise. This may be adverse to people's faculty of audition added than abiding use.That is the acumen canalphones best accepted as the arch of the headphones. Monster Headphones accent aswell comes with a angle charwoman bolt so that they attending actual beautiful. Dr Dre ambit there are abounding altered styles, colors as prices. You can aswell get in-ear buds in the event, that is your preference.
Monster Earphones
Monster Beats Studio
wholesale monster headphones
Monster Beats Solo HD
Monster Limited Edition
Monster Artist
hdfgdfg123456
Posted by: cheap monster headphones online shop | December 29, 2011 at 12:13 AM